Keywords
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: Frontline healthcare workers have a high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19. The use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to prevent this occupational disease. Surgical masks and filtering face piece (FFP) respirators are important parts of this PPE. The aim of this laboratory test is to determine and quantify the filtration and fit rate of different FFP respirators, singly and in combination with surgical masks, by performing a series of fit tests and consequently, to check whether this combination improves protection levels for healthcare workers who care for COVID-19 patients.
Material and Methods: Several FFP respirators and surgical masks, singly and in combination, were fit tested with a PortaCount Pro + 8038, which fulfills OSHA standards, in a series of tests performed on healthcare workers in seven different breathing situations when taking care on COVID-19 patients, in order to determine and quantify their fit to the workers’ face.
Results: Wearing a surgical mask together with a highly efficient FFP respirator provided increased respiratory protection. Interestingly, one of these highly efficient FFP models, combined with a surgical mask, achieved a protection factor over 200 (whereas 100 is the minimum required protection factor).
Conclusions: Surgical masks, when used together with a FFP2 respirator, could significantly improve the degree of fit of all self-filtering face piece by providing greater filtration efficiency and greater user protection from exposure to aerosols.
References
Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199-1207.
Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(14):1406-1407.
Kai-Wang To K, Tak-Yin Tsang O, Leung WS, Tam AR, Wu TC, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):565-574.
Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581(7809):465-469.
Zhang J, Litvinova M, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(7):793-802.
Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. New Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177-1179.
Chatterjee P, Nagi N, Agarwal A, Das B, Banerjee S, et al. The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A review of the current evidence. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(2-3):147-159.
World Health Organization (WHO). Rational use of personal protective equipment for COVID-19 and considerations during severe shortages: interim guidance. Consultado 4 Julio 2020. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/338033
Tartari E, Hopman J, Allegranzi B, Gao B, Widmer A, et al. Perceived challenges of COVID-19 infection prevention and control preparedness: A multinational survey. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:779-781.
Lee K, Shukla V, Clark M, Mierzwinski-Urban M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - resource use implications: a systematic review. CADTH Technol Overv. 2012;2(3):e23
Chang D, Xu H, Rebaza A, Dela Cruz CS. Protecting health-care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(3):e13.
World Health Organization (WHO). Mask use in the context of COVID-19.1 December 2020 WHO/2019-nCoV/IPC_Masks/2020.5. Consultado 4 Julio 2020.
Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331493/WHO-2019-nCoV-IPC_Masks-2020.2-eng.pdf
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Personal protective equipment (PPE) needs in healthcare settings for the care of patients with suspected or confirmed 2019-nCoV. Eur Cent Dis Prev Control Pers Prot Equip needs Healthc settings care patients with suspected or confirmed 2019-nCoV ECDC Stock 2020. Consultado 4 Julio 2020. Disponible en: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/personal-protective-equipment-ppe-needs-healthcare-settings-care-patients#no-link
Wizner K, Nasarwanji M, Fisher E, et al. Exploring respiratory protection practices for prominent hazards in healthcare settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;15(8):588-597.
Dharmadhikari AS, Mphahlele M, Stoltz A, Venter K, Mathebula R, et al. Surgical Face Masks Worn by Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Impact on Infectivity of Air on a Hospital Ward. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(10):1104-9.
MacIntyre C, Chughtai A, Seale H. Uncertainty, risk analysis and change for Ebola personal protective equipment guidelines. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(5):899-903.
Macintyre R, Chughtai AA. For personal use only Facemasks for the prevention of infection in healthcare and community settings. BMJ. 2015;350:h694.
Cheng VC, Tai JW, Wong LM, Chan JF, Li IW, et al. Prevention of nosocomial transmission of swine-origin pandemic influenza virus A/H1N1 by infection control bundle. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74(3):271-277
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Infection prevention and control and preparedness for COVID-19 in healthcare settings – Fifth update. Consultado 6 Octubre 2020.Disponible en : https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Infection-prevention-and-control-in-healthcare-settings-COVID-19_4th_update.pdf
Norma UNE-EN 149:2001+A1:2010. Dispositivos de protección respiratoria. Medias máscaras filtrantes de protección contra partículas. Requisitos, ensayos, marcado. Consultado 31 enero 2021. Disponible en: https://www.une.org/encuentra-tu-norma/busca-tu-norma/norma?c=N0044643
Lepelletier D, Grandbastien B, Romano-Bertrand S, Aho S, Chidiac C, et al. What face mask for what use in the context of COVID-19 pandemic? The French guidelines. J Hosp Infect. 2020;105(3):414–8.
Bollinger, Nancy US. NIOSH Respirator Selection Logic. October 2004. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-100. Consultado 31 enero 2021. Disponible en: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-100/default.html
Ippolito M, Vitale F, Accurso G, Iozzo P, Gregoretti C, et al. Medical masks and Respirators for the Protection of Healthcare Workers from SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses. Pulmonology. 2020;26(4):204-212.
Roberge RJ, Coca A, Williams WJ, Palmiero AJ, Powell JB. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Physiological effects on healthcare workers. Respirology. 2010;15(3):516-21.
Chan J, Yuan S, Kok K, To K, Chu H, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet [Internet]. 2020;395(10223):514-23.
Matthews R, Young A. Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020; 59(1):165-166.
Bartoszko JJ, Farooqi MAM, Alhazzani W, Loeb M. Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020;14(4): 365-373.
Aljazeera News. ¿Which countries have made wearing face masks compulsory? (17.08.2020). Consultado 31 enero 2021. Disponible en: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/8/17/which-countries-have-made-wearing-face-masks-compulsory
Mueller AV, Eden MJ, Oakes JM, Bellini C, Fernandez LA. Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE. Matter. 2020;3(3):950-962.
Chua MH, Cheng W, Goh SS, Kong J, Li B, et al. Face Masks in the New COVID-19 Normal: Materials, Testing, and Perspectives. Research (Wash D C). 2020;2020: 7286735.
The authors whose submissions are published in this Journal accept the following terms:
The copyright is held by the author(s), which will simultaneously be subject to a licence Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-ND.
The author(s) may enter into any other licence agreements for non-exclusive distribution of versions of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or publication in a collective work) provided that the initial publication in this Journal is stated.
The author/s is/are permitted and recommended to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).