Design and validation of the telework perception scale (Tele-Cov-19) in Peruvian primary schoolteachers
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Occupational health; Telework; School teachers; Peru.

How to Cite

1.
Mamani-Benito OJ, Sucapuca Quispe EJ, Yapu Jallo L, Carranza Esteban RF, Turpo Chaparro JE, Lingan SK. Design and validation of the telework perception scale (Tele-Cov-19) in Peruvian primary schoolteachers. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 15 [cited 2024 Jul. 16];25(3):259-70. Available from: https://archivosdeprevencion.eu/index.php/aprl/article/view/175

Abstract

Introduction: To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.

Method: This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.

Results: The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett’s test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p < 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 – 0.92).

Conclusions: The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.

https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03
PDF (Español (España))

References

Mouratidis K, Papagiannakis A. COVID-19, internet, and mobility: The rise of telework, telehealth, e-learning, and e-shopping. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021;74:103182.

Mejia CR, Rodriguez-Alarcon JF, Charri JC, Liendo-venegas D, Morocho-Alburqueque N, Benites-Ibarra C, et al. Repercusión académica de la COVID-19 en universitarios peruanos. Rev Cuba Investig Biomédicas. 2021;40(1):e814.

Mejia CR, Rodriguez-Alarcon JF, Ponce-lopez VL, Perez-espinoza P, Duran-castro H, Mamani-Benito O, et al. Percepción de los efectos COVID-19 en la educación presencial y a distancia en estudiantes universitarios del Perú. Bol Malariol y Salud Ambient. 2021;61(2):352–9.

Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Ginebra: El teletrabajo durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y después de ella. [actualizado 15 Ago 2021; citado 15 de Ago de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_758007.pdf

Barbour N, Menon N, Mannering F. A statistical assessment of work-from-home participation during different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021;11:100441.

Cockburn W, Hurtado M. Perspectiva europea sobre los riesgos laborales en el ámbito del teletrabajo. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2021;24(2):95–8.

Tapasco O, Giraldo J. Factores asociados a la disposición por el teletrabajo entre docentes universitarios. Cienc Trab. 2016;18(56):87–93.

Wulida T, Artatanaya IG, Burgess J. Working from home effectiveness during Covid-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Manag Rev. 2022;27(1):50–57.

Schmitt JB, Breuer J, Wulf T. Computers in Human Behavior From cognitive overload to digital detox : Psychological implications of telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput Human Behav. 2021;124:106899.

Oksanen A, Oksa R, Savela N, Mantere E, Savolainen I, Kaakinen M. Computers in Human Behavior COVID-19 crisis and digital stressors at work : A longitudinal study on the Finnish working population. Comput Human Behav. 2021;122:106853.

Tønnessen Ø, Dhir A, Flåten BT. Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;170:120866.

Cuerdo-Vilches T, Navas-Martín MÁ, March S, Oteiza I. Adequacy of telework spaces in homes during the lockdown in Madrid, according to socioeconomic factors and home features. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021;75:103262.

Sandoval-Reyes J, Idrovo-Carlier S, Duque-Oliva EJ. Remote work, work stress, and work–life during pandemic times: A Latin America situation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):7069.

Medina-Guillen LF, Quintanilla-Ferrufino GJ, Palma-Vallejo M, Medina MF. Workload in a group of Latin American teachers during the covid-19 pandemic. Uniciencia. 2021;35(2):1–13.

Berniell L, Fernandez D. Jobs’ amenability is not enough: The role of household inputs for safe work under social distancing in Latin American cities. World Dev. 2021;140:105247.

Valencia A. Aspectos regulatorios del teletrabajo en el Perú: análisis y perspectivas. Rev del Inst Ciencias Juridicas Puebla. 2018;12(41):226.

Almonacid-Nieto JM, Calderón-Espinal MA, Vicente-Ramos W. Teleworking effect on job burnout of higher education administrative personnel in the Junín region, Peru. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2020;4(4):373–80.

Oros LB, Vargas Rubilar N, Chemisquy S. Estresores docentes en tiempos de pandemia: un instrumento para su exploración. Interam J Psychol. 2020;54(3):e1421.

Filardi F, De Castro RM, Zanini MT. Advantages and disadvantages of teleworking in Brazilian public administration: analysis of SERPRO and Federal Revenue experiences. Cad EBAPEBR. 2020;18(1):28–46.

Tramontano C, Grant C, Clarke C. Development and validation of the e-Work Self-Efficacy Scale to assess digital competencies in remote working. Comput Hum Behav Reports. 2021;4:100129.

Ato M, López J, Benavente A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. An Psicol. 2013;29(3):1038–59.

Benavides FG. La salud de los trabajadores y la COVID-19. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2020;23(2):154–8.

Chang Y, Chien C, Shen LF. Telecommuting during the coronavirus pandemic: Future time orientation as a mediator between proactive coping and perceived work productivity in two cultural samples. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;171:110508.

Contreras F, Baykal E, Abid G. E-Leadership and Teleworking in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: What We Know and Where Do We Go. Front Psychol. 2020;11:590271.

Golden TD, Eddleston KA. Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. J Vocat Behav. 2020;116:103348.

Miglioretti M, Gragnano A, Margheritti S, Picco E. Not All Telework is Valuable. Rev Psicol del Trab y las Organ. 2021;37(1):11–9.

Streiner DL. Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(1):99–103.

Balgiu BA. Measurement of the main factors involved in teleworking: Validation of the E-work life scale among romanian teleworkers. Work. 2022. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211153.

Medina A, Martínez-Rodríguez M, Avila-vidal A, González-Borrego Y, Hernández-Diaz M. Construcción y validación de contenido de cuestionarios de teletrabajo y trabajo a distancia. Rev Psicol para Am Lat. 2021;(35):89–104.

Grant CA, Wallace LM, Spurgeon PC, Tramontano C, Charalampous M. Construction and initial validation of the E-Work Life Scale to measure remote e-working. Empl Relations. 2019;41(1):16–33.

Pascual JL. Novedades desde el Instituto Catalán de Seguridad y Salud Laboral: Valoración del teletrabajo en el contexto actual y en proyección de futuro. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2021;24(2):204-19.

Lizana PA, Vega-Fernadez G. Teacher teleworking during the covid-19 pandemic: Association between work hours, work–family balance and quality of life. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7566.

Palma-Vasquez C, Carrasco D, Hernando-Rodriguez JC. Mental Health of Teachers Who Have Teleworked Due to COVID-19. Eur J Investig Heal Psychol Educ. 2021;11(2):515–28.

Utzet M, Martin U. Las encuestas online y la falsa ilusión de la n grande. A propósito de una encuesta sobre la eutanasia en profesionales médicos. Gac Sanit. 2020;34(5):518–20.

The authors whose submissions are published in this Journal accept the following terms:

The copyright is held by the author(s), which will simultaneously be subject to a licence Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-ND.

The author(s) may enter into any other licence agreements for non-exclusive distribution of versions of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or publication in a collective work) provided that the initial publication in this Journal is stated.

The author/s is/are permitted and recommended to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.